1. The Plaintiff:

A. The defendant Won-si shall also refer to attached 20, 35, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 25, among the 1,061 square meters in the 1,061 square meters in the 1,061 square meters in the Haju-si.

Plaintiff’s assertion

Summary

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the 1,061m2 (hereinafter “instant land”).

Defendant Won-si installed cement structure (hereinafter “the cement structure of this case”) on the ship which connects each point of 20, 35, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 12, 19, and 20 of the attached reference table among the land of this case without permission, and on the cement structure (hereinafter “the cement structure of this case”) with part 62 square meters of the attached reference table among the land of this case (hereinafter “the part of this case”) 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 34, 10, 11, and 33 of the attached reference table among the land of this case, and Defendant Eul occupied the part of the cement structure of this case (hereinafter “the instant cement structure”).

B. Therefore, Defendant Won-si has the duty to remove the cement structure of this case and deliver the part of the instant cement structure to the Plaintiff, and Defendant B has the duty to deliver the part of the remedy for damages on the instant ship.

Judgment

1) Evidence A Nos. 1, 3 through 5 (if any, including a branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply) for the cause of the claim

(2) According to the reasoning of the judgment below, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the above legal principles, and failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the above legal principles, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal. In so doing, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the above legal principles, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal, contrary to what is alleged in the ground of appeal, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

As to the defendants' assertion as to the defendant Won-si's assertion, the cement structure of this case in the summary of the defendant Won-si's assertion is established by the defendant Lee Won-si as part of the DD Village Residents' Accommodation Project around 2008 and as part of the D Village Residents' Accommodation Project.