1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) filed against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) KRW 1,296,309 and the Plaintiff’s counterclaim from May 1, 2012 to June 20, 2014.

1. On May 1, 2012, at around 13:40 on May 1, 2012, C driven a D vehicle that entered into an automobile insurance contract with the Plaintiff listed in the attached Table 2 (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff vehicle”), and driven a rearer of Defendant A’s E-Vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant vehicle”) who stops in front of the motion picture class in the Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, and driven the rearer by the fronter of the Plaintiff vehicle.

(Attachment 1) In the instant accident, Defendant A received each of the following medical treatments on the ground that Defendant B suffered bodily injury on the ground that Defendant B suffered bodily injury on the part of “Sacheon-gu, Sacheon-gu, Sacheon-gu’s Sacheon-gu, Sacheon-gu’s Sacheon-gu, Saman’s Saman’s Saman’s Saman, Saman’s Saman’s Saman’s Saman’s Saman and Saman’s Saman’s Saman’s Saman’s Saman’s Sain

Defendant A: The statement in Funified Country on May 2, 2012, from May 2 to May 22, 2012, 2012, from May 23, 2012, to 26, 2013, Defendant B: Defendant B, including Gun Foreign Medical Institution, etc.: The fact that there is no dispute over the ground for recognition, Party A’s evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 4 (including household numbers), Party B’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 26 (including household numbers) respectively, and the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments.

2. The assertion;

A. Since the damage suffered by the Defendants due to the accident in this case is either caused by the king or is excessive compared to the usual treatment period, there is no insurance obligation in the event that the sum of KRW 1,210,000 in accordance with the standard for the payment of the insurance clause, and the sum of KRW 250,000 in 250,000, and other damages (=8,000 x 120) in accordance with the standard for the payment of the insurance clause, and KRW 250,000 in 250,000 in 30,000 in 1,202,00 in 30 (=8,000 x 119) in the case of the Defendant B

B. The counterclaim Defendants received medical treatment for the injury caused by the instant accident, not spawn, and thus, the Plaintiff received 23,047,303 won from the Defendant A with daily income, hospital expenses, weak value, transportation expenses, consolation money, etc., and Defendant B with hospital expenses, weak value, transportation expenses, and consolation money.