logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.07 2017가합537492
청구이의
Text

1. It guarantees 270,000,000 won as a settlement of accounts against the Defendant of D Co., Ltd. and the Defendant.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) (hereinafter “C”) under a loan agreement and Escro;

(E) On March 27, 2015, E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) for the purpose of raising the purchase price of secured non-performing loans acquired from the Plaintiff.

(1) The loan agreement between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant loan agreement”) under which the Plaintiff is to obtain a loan of KRW 59,100,000 from E and KRW 5,00,000 from the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant loan agreement”) by designating the Plaintiff as the lender in priority to the lender.

The loan agreement of this case was entered into. The affirmative implementation of Article XI and the Borrower (C; hereinafter the same shall apply) relating to this case.

from the date of the conclusion of this Agreement to the date of full payment of the loan, the following shall be observed:

Paragraph 8 Other Matters to be Observed

3. The borrower shall entrust the custodian of a senior lender (E; hereinafter the same shall apply) with the custody of a corporation on the date of withdrawal, and the depreciation of a corporation after the repayment of senior loans shall be deemed to be transferred to a senior lender (hereinafter the same shall apply);

The borrower shall comply with the following provisions until he/she fully pays the loan:

Paragraph 4. A borrower who is prohibited from borrowing may not borrow any additional loan other than that provided for in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the lender.

The borrower who is prohibited from current account transactions under paragraph (5) may not carry out current account transactions, such as the issuance of bills without the prior written consent of the lender.

Details are as follows:

2) As under the instant loan agreement, the Plaintiff, E, and C had to enter into an e-mail contract under the prior terms of the loan. As such, the Plaintiff, E, and C, March 27, 2015, the prior lender, E, the next lender, and the Plaintiff, E, and F, the agent of the Plaintiff, E, and C (hereinafter “F”).

b) The Defendant entered into a contract with D on March 19, 2015 (hereinafter “D”) with D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”).

From Gangnam-gu Seoul to J apartment I, the name of the J bank established for H apartment I.

arrow