beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. A. Around June 10, 2009, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Plaintiff on the construction of additional construction to expand the underground of the Plaintiff and the said warehouse facilities (hereinafter referred to as “the instant warehouse construction”) on the land on the land outside the limit of 577-9 and one parcel of land from June 22, 2009 to January 22, 2010; the construction cost of the construction is KRW 1,831,50,000; the final payment date of the construction cost is within 15 days after delivery of the object; the said construction was undertaken; the said construction was conducted on August 7, 2009; the said construction was conducted on the remainder of the construction cost of the instant warehouse after the lapse of 2,051,500,000 won; the Plaintiff continued to receive the remainder of the construction cost from the Plaintiff around 37, 207 and around 15, 2010.
B. After that, around March 21, 2012, the Defendant: (a) the construction period of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s construction of the heating line construction for the said warehouse facilities (hereinafter “instant heating line construction”); and (b) the construction period from March 26, 2012 to March 26, 2012
4. up to 13. The construction work price of KRW 9,900,00 and the time for payment of the construction work price of KRW 5,000,000 were concluded at the time of the contract with the content that the contract shall be awarded within three days after the completion of the construction work, and the remainder of KRW 4,900,000 was paid 5,000 from the Plaintiff on the same day, and the construction work of this case was completed after the completion of the construction work, but the Defendant did not receive the remainder of KRW 4,90,000 from the Defendant.
C. Meanwhile, around March 21, 2012, the Plaintiff paid KRW 20,000,000 to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant money”).
The defendant around January 8, 2014 against the plaintiff, and the warehouse of this case.