logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2018.12.19 2018고단277
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 2018, while under the influence of alcohol leveling to 0.120% during blood alcohol leveling to 18:50% on Sep. 2, 2018, the Defendant driven B Poter truck at a section of about 300 meters from the front of the road in the Gyeong-gun, Chang-gun, Chang-gun, Seoul, to the road in the same Ri.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. (B) the next inquiry, the statement of the circumstances of the driver in charge, the investigation report (report on the circumstances of the driver in charge), the notification of the results of crackdown on the driving of drinking, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about the results of crackdown on driving of drinking;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The elements of sentencing that are disadvantageous to the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act: The elements of sentencing that the Defendant, even though having been sentenced to two times of a fine due to having been sentenced to a previous criminal punishment for driving under the influence of alcohol: The Defendant recognizes the Defendant’s mistake in depth and reflects it; the Defendant’s degree of alcohol level is not high; the Defendant’s dependent exists; and there is room to take into account the circumstances of driving under the influence of alcohol; other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, are comprehensive.

arrow