Text
Defendant
A and B shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months, and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
E (State) The construction of G apartment (hereinafter “new construction of this case”) with the size of 20 stories underground and above ground located in the F in Sinpo City. H (State) is a subcontractor which entered into a contract with E (State) from June 18, 2012 to October 31, 2012, and (State) is a subcontractor which entered into a contract with E (P) and a contract for the supervision of new construction of this case.
Defendant
B From November 2013, as the site manager of the said E (State), is stationed at the site of the instant new construction project from November 201 to the site manager of the said E (State) and is a general manager responsible for the process management and safety and health management, etc., Defendant A is a person in charge of supervising the excavation work and the construction of home facilities subcontracted to the site manager of the said H (State). Defendant C is a person in charge of supervising the overall construction work and providing technical guidance.
H From July 2012, since the ground of the new construction of the instant case became a grhetorite cancer, the construction of the ground was conducted due to blasting, and accordingly, the cracks and ground subsidences occurred at the J apartment parking lot in the wooden-si J apartment parking lot.
On July 3, 2013, 2013 and July 9, 2013, the Posting and viewing of the instant new construction site was sent a door to the public announcement to thoroughly examine the structural stability of the soil mosing facilities, which may prevent damage, such as ground subsidence, to the supervision at the construction site of the instant new construction site, and to thoroughly implement the construction work so that the soil mosing facility can be destroyed.
In addition, on October 2013, J apartment residents requested the K Research Institute, which is a specialized institution for construction safety diagnosis, to conduct a safety diagnosis, and there is a concern that ground activities and subsidences might occur, and the progress of excavation works based on the design drawing is required to be closely reviewed, and they expressed to E (ju) that the CIP method used for the construction is inappropriate, but E (ju) and H (H) without further review.