logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.09.25 2017고단2018
협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be forfeited from the defendant.

In this case.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who became aware of the Internet C music room, exchanged with the text message or telephone on the Internet, and was in custody of the victim’s dynamic image and the body photograph, etc. from the victim’s self-defense, while receiving the victim’s dynamic image and the body photograph. The Defendant had been able to spread the dynamic image, etc. by avoiding contact with the Defendant while hedging with the Defendant.

On December 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) registered the instant account with the message, such as “I would like to report to the five males if the situation permits to permit the situation; and (b) “I would like to see if I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see I would like to ever I would like to see I would like to ever I would like to see I would like to ever I would like to ever I would like to ever I would like to see I would like to me in their sexual organ on the right side and left side,” by registering I would like to the instant account with the message, “I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see their face and sexual organ to I would like to see I would like to be exposed to you.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the screen after each closure;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the relevant Act and Articles 74(1)2 and 44-7(1)1 (a) of the Act on Promotion of the Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc., concerning criminal facts, and the selection of imprisonment with prison labor;

2. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act was committed by the Defendant with the victim, resulting in the victim’s self-definite image, exposure photograph, etc., and thereafter, the victim, who ended the contact with the Defendant, pretended to have been posted to the social media account by the victim.

arrow