logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.05.15 2015노6
상해등
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding 600,000 won.

The above fine shall be imposed on the defendant.

Reasons

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment and fine of 600,000 won, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant ex officio shall be examined ex officio.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, namely, ① the Defendant was hospitalized in a hospital due to depression, alcohol abuse, mental divided disease, and bipolar disorder from December 2, 2013 to February 17, 2014; ② the Defendant appears to have been in a state of drinking after drinking alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime on September 20, 2014; ③ according to the mental appraisal result with the head of the competent public medical treatment and custody headquarters at the first instance trial, AD shows the status of the Defendant in a state of alcohol dependence; ② the Defendant appears to have been in a state of mental disorder at the time of committing the instant crime; ② the Defendant appears to have been in a state of mental disorder at the time of committing the instant crime; and ③ according to the mental appraisal result with regard to the head of the competent public medical treatment and custody headquarters at the time of the instant crime; the Defendant appears to have been in an unstable state of mental disorder at the time of committing the instant crime; and the Defendant appears to have been in a state of mental disorder or alcohol influence at the same time.

3. If so, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act without examining the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing, and it is again decided as follows.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged by the court and the summary of the evidence are as follows: "Defendants" in the first sentence of "2014 Highest 6970" in the judgment below.

arrow