logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.11.30 2018가단515536
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Defendants deliver each of the buildings listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an association established to implement a housing redevelopment improvement project under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”).

B. On March 23, 2015, the Plaintiff obtained authorization from the head of the Gu from North Gwangju Metropolitan City, and obtained authorization to implement the project on March 31, 2017.

After that, on November 15, 2017, the management and disposal plan of the instant project was authorized, and the said authorization was publicly announced on November 16, 2017.

C. Defendant B and C are the owners of the buildings indicated in the separate sheet located within the instant project implementation zone (hereinafter “each of the instant buildings”), and Defendant D is the tenants of the buildings indicated in the separate sheet.

The Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication of expropriation of each building of this case with the Seoul Metropolitan City Regional Land Expropriation Committee on August 9, 2018, and deposited each compensation set forth in the said adjudication with Defendant B and C on September 20, 2018 (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”), which was rendered on September 21, 2018 (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”).

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 8, purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to Article 81(1) of the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation Therefor, a right holder, such as the owner of the previous land or structure, may not use or benefit from a management and disposition plan when the authorization of a management and disposition plan is publicly announced. However, the foregoing provision does not apply where the project operator’s consent or the compensation for losses under the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc.

According to the main sentence of Article 65 (1) of the Act, the Land Compensation Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the expropriation or use of ownership and other rights of land or buildings for the implementation of a housing redevelopment improvement project within a housing redevelopment improvement zone, except as otherwise provided in the Act.

arrow