Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 15:00 on November 28, 201, Defendant A: (a) on the frontway of the E farmwon operated by the said Defendant, Defendant A, the main owner of a neighboring farmer, installed in the said Defendant’s farm without permission, in a large way, a banner, stating his own name and contact address; (b) reported the shape that Defendant A installed in the said Defendant’s farm, without permission, and carried the flag and flag’s kne, which requires medical treatment for 14 days, and led the victim to the flag’s flag, kne, and kne’s flae.

2. Defendant B heard the sound disputing Defendant A and F, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in the foregoing 1.1. at the same time, and at the same time, and at the F’s wife G (36 years of age, women) was f, and assaulted Defendant A and Defendant A by putting the hum to the hume, “humf humf..............”

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Statements of Defendant B in part of the first trial records;

1. Statement made by a witness F in the fifth trial records;

1. Entry of inspection records in the fourth trial records;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Application of suspect F's superior position, injury diagnosis certificate, and applicable field photograph Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendants bearing litigation costs: Determination as to Defendant B and defense counsel’s assertion of Articles 191(1) and 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant Eul and his wife Eul, who had much age than the victim, expressed his desire first to the victim Eul and the defendant A, and only her only bruptly maintained their losses. Thus, the above acts of the defendant do not go against the social norms.