The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged of this case [criminal records] The Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.) at the Ulsan District Court on January 30, 2015 and completed the execution of the sentence at the Ulsan District Court on April 4, 2016.

[2] On April 4, 2016, at around 21:35, the Defendant refused the Defendant’s refusal to “the victim shall not open to the outside of the inside and outside of the inside and outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the

As a result, the defendant put about about about two weeks the part on the right eye and the part on the right eye, and about two weeks the snow eye and the heat around the snow.

2. The fact that the Defendant’s assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel carried the crypter’s eyebrow by leaving the crypter’s disease at the time and place indicated in the facts charged, but whether the crypter was the victim’s eyebrow is not memory. However, in the process of defrying the crypter’s face, there is a possibility that the crypter’s injury, such as the written facts charged, would have been inflicted on the victim

3. Determination

A. The establishment of facts constituting an offense in a criminal trial shall be based on strict evidence with probative value, which leads to a judge to have a reasonable doubt, to such a degree that there is no room for a reasonable doubt. Therefore, in a case where the prosecutor’s proof fails to sufficiently reach the extent that such conviction would lead to such a conviction, even if there is suspicion of guilt, such as the defendant’s assertion or defense is inconsistent or unreasonable.