logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2014.08.21 2014고정148
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has driven a vehicle B in the course of business.

On December 23, 2013, at around 00:05, the Defendant continued to run approximately 60-70km each other of the two lanes in speed, from the front side of the Yolk-si to the front side of the Yolk-si of the racing at the speed of about 60-70km each other.

At that time, the signal was installed at a three-distance crossing, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent any traffic accidents by properly keeping the traffic situation on the front left right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right and right right right and driving safely according to his own signals.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this while proceeding signals on the front side of the vehicle, and the defendant, at that time, did not proceed as it is, and at that time, conflict with the part on the right side of the damaged vehicle C Lastata taxi, which was driven by the front side of the vehicle in the U.S.-ton zone facing the direction of the vehicle moving from the front side of the vehicle.

Ultimately, due to the Defendant’s occupational negligence, the Defendant suffered injury such as the left-hand sloak sloak in need of treatment for about two weeks to the passengers of the Defendant’s vehicle D (the age of 46), and the Defendant suffered injury such as dloak sloaks, tensions, etc. of the bones of wood, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment to the victims E (the age of 46) of rocketing taxi drivers

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow