Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 9, 2010, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of a fine of two million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the Daegu District Court's sexual branch on August 9, 2010, and on April 25, 2013, the above court received three times the records of punishment for driving under drinking, such as being notified of a summary order of a fine of three million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving).

On April 10, 2017, the Defendant driven a B1 ton cargo vehicle from the 3km section to the front side of the Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, G in the form of alcohol alcohol level of 0.08% at around 0:09, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.08%.

Accordingly, even though the Defendant violated the prohibition clause on driving under the influence of alcohol more than twice, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of a driver who is placed in driving and notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Records of the judgment: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, reports on investigation (Attachment to the records of the same kind of punishment as the suspect), and application of the summary order and the text of the judgment and the attached statutes of

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant has been punished three times for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, or that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects his behavior, and that the drinking volume at the time of the crime of this case was not high at the time of the crime of this case, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, motive, means, method, and consequence of the crime of this case, and all the other conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, shall be determined as the order.