Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of each of the above penalties shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the representative director of C, and the defendant A is the representative director of C, and he is the vice president of C as the "D Co., Ltd. (Seoul Office) construction franchise."

As the business funds of the Defendants are insufficient, the Defendants colored the company to receive the removal of the said site, such as Gyeonggi-si, E, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the “Seocheon E site”), which was planned to implement the said C, and received the money as the deposit money for the removal work and received it in order to use it by division.

Defendant

A around February 11, 2012, the victim G, who is the removal business entity, through the “FF Chairperson,” etc., of the construction hub of the construction project, concluded to the effect that “The removal of the construction site of the Gyeonggi-do Urban Residential Housing Construction site may be 290 million won if only KRW 60 million is invested. The construction remaining after deducting taxes. The construction of 40 million remains. The construction of the TX construction has already been completed, such as the payment guarantee and the construction of the STX. As the STX construction has already been completed, the construction may begin within one week and late.”

However, in fact, the Defendants were unable to purchase land from the owners of the land in the above Bupyeong E site due to the lack of funds or obtain the consent to use the land, and the Defendants failed to obtain the consent to participate in the construction from the STX Construction, and even if they received money from the victims due to the failure of the competent authorities to obtain the project permission, they did not have the intent or ability to place the order to remove the above construction within a limited period.

Nevertheless, on February 13, 2013, the Defendants deceiving the victim and received KRW 50 million as the deposit money for removal from the Defendant’s office near the additional digital group area in Guro-gu Seoul, the victim’s agent.

As a result, the Defendants were provided property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Trial records of the first time;