The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning, the lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

There is no error of law of misunderstanding facts beyond the limit of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules or misunderstanding the legal principles on the concept of injury in the crime of rape and injury.

Meanwhile, according to Article 383 subparag. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years

In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.