The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. As to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Egressing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (In the facts charged in the instant case, as to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Egressing Vehicles) among the charges charged in the instant case, the lower part of the lower part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle was lost at the time of the instant accident, and the Defendant was in low blood, and the Defendant was unaware of the collision with the damaged vehicle

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (a punishment of KRW 7 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실 오인 주장에 관한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 이 사건 사고로 피해 차량의 우측 앞 범퍼 부분이 심하게 우그러지고 우측 방향지시 등이 탈락되고, 피고인 운전 차량 역 시 뒷 유리창이 완전히 깨지는 등 큰 충격이 있었던 것으로 보이는 점, 이 사건 사고 당시 피고인도 차량을 일시 정차하였고, 그 후 멈칫 멈칫하면서 사고 현장을 이탈한 점 등을 종합하면, 이 사건 사고 당시 피고인은 사고가 일어나 피해자가 다쳤거나 피해 차량이 손괴되었을지도 모른다고 인식하면서도 그 가능성을 외면하면서 도주의 범의로 사고 현장에서 이탈하였음이 인정된다.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below is just in finding the defendant guilty of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (the post-accident), and there is an error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts

subsection (b) of this section.

B. There is no change of circumstances to consider the sentencing after the judgment of the court below on the unfair argument of sentencing, and the reasons for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case are compared with the reasons for sentencing of the judgment of the court below.