1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid in addition to the following shall be revoked.

1. The grounds for the court’s explanation concerning the occurrence and scope of liability for damages are as follows: “Plaintiff A”; “Plaintiff B and C” as “Plaintiff Joint Plaintiff B and C of the first instance trial; “No. 6th and May 31, 2014, which is the day following the date of the closure of the argument in this case”; “No. 6th and No. 17th, May 5, 2015, which is the day following the date of the closure of the argument in this case”; “No. 20th, May 30, 2015, which was one year after the date of the closure of the argument in this case,” “No. 10th and June 5, 2016,” “No. 10th and May 30, 2015,” “No. 7th and May 5, 2016,” “No. 5th of this court’s appraisal of the body character of Seoul University,” and “No. 10th and 6th of the Seoul University.

[Supplementary Use] D. D.

The nursing expense: The phrase " nursing expense" in the attached Form of the damages calculation sheet shall be as the same.

Considering the fact that the Plaintiff is currently unable to walk and establish, the Plaintiff is not able to properly walk and build, and that the language shot and is in an inaccurate state, and that the Plaintiff’s situation does not seem to have been particularly improved during the first instance court’s physical examination at three times. In light of the emotional health of the Seoul Hospital in 196 Seoul, it is pointed out that there is a risk of abortion and accidents caused by voluntary movements, and that the doctor N in the Mvalescent Hospital pointed out that there is a risk of livering trauma, it is reasonable to deem that the Plaintiff requires the opening of 12 hours a day by the end of the life.

Therefore, it is true.