logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.02.05 2014고단2019
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant committed the crime against the victim C around December 18, 2014 at the E-cafeteria located in Sinpo City D on December 2, 2014, the Defendant carried out an internal autopsy where the number of days of treatment cannot be identified as the victim’s disease, which is a dangerous article on the A-Sable table, was collected so far as it was difficult for the victim to have the victim go against the victim.

2. In relation to the case where the Defendant committed a crime against the Victim F on October 19, 2013, the Defendant had a favorable appraisal against the Victim F on the ground that the Victim F made a statement unfavorable to him/her by an investigative agency on the ground that the Victim F made a statement unfavorable to him/her.

On December 2, 2014, around 18:14, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the destruction and damage, etc. of collective, deadly weapons, etc.) borrowed KRW 20,00 to the victim from the Istza operated by the victim F, who was in F, Mapopo-si, but, on the ground that the victim refused it, damaged the air conditioners owned by the victim so that it can be 50,00 won of the cost of repair by destroying the air conditioners, which are dangerous objects, so that the victim's refusal to do so.

B. On December 9, 2014, at around 17:30, the Defendant: (a) arrested the victim F as a flagrant offender by shouldering frigerants and glass; (b) released the victim’s complaint; and (c) found the victim’s complaint to the said Isper; but (d) the victim flicked the victim’s door and broken the entrance door at the entrance door, thereby damaging the repair cost of KRW 80,00,000.

Summary of Evidence

[Fact 1]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s statement;

1. According to the above evidence evidence, the victim C is found to have a flicke in this part of this part, which goes beyond simply a hole in this part, and the victim C has a flicke with a flicke by a flicke.

Therefore, the victim.

arrow