beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 31,288,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from December 5, 201 to November 4, 2015, and the following.
Reasons
Basic facts are that the Plaintiff runs the Do and retail business of hydrogen, etc. in the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City C market, and the Defendant runs the sales business of vegetables, etc. in the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D market with the trade name "E".
The Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with a collection, etc. from the mid-term period of 2010 to December 2, 2011. The transaction method is that the Defendant pays the amount of goods according to the tax invoice, where the Plaintiff, through F, determined and sold the price and quantity of the collection for each transaction to the Defendant through F, who is an employee of the Defendant.
Meanwhile, from November 6, 201 to November 25, 2011, F cut off the sum of KRW 28.8 million from the Plaintiff’s office’s representative director at the Plaintiff’s office. From September 5, 2011 to December 5, 2011, F contacted the Plaintiff’s comprehensive customer account statement with the Plaintiff’s office at the Plaintiff’s office. From August 24, 2011 to December 24, 2011, the Plaintiff saved the Plaintiff with the Plaintiff’s comprehensive customer account statement with the Plaintiff’s term-based customer account. From August 24, 2011 to December 2, 2011, F stored the Plaintiff with the lower unit price or deleted the items in the attached list (However, the number 8-36,124,30 won, KRW 300, KRW 23,249,800, KRW 23279,800).
Accordingly, the Plaintiff issued a tax invoice, etc. on the basis of the sales unit price entered or deleted with the Defendant, which was entered in the said “period customer comprehensive account statement program”, and filed a claim against the Defendant by issuing the tax invoice, etc. on the basis of the sales unit price entered or deleted as above. The Defendant paid only the amount claimed by the Plaintiff as the tax invoice, etc.
On the other hand, F was prosecuted for violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and this Court convicted him of all criminal facts on September 6, 2012.