1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiffs, the Defendant, and the Intervenor joining the Defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are incidental to the participation.

1. Details of the project of the intervenor who was established on June 14, 1999 in the course of the decision on the retrial;

7. On November 9, 2010, the fact that he/she accepted the racing business headquarters from N Co., Ltd. and used 880 full-time workers to manufacture motor vehicle parts, such as the Plaintiffs’ position, supplied to the completed company, and constitutes an O labor union (hereinafter “O labor union”) or an Oo-Pacific Branch P branch (hereinafter “P branch”)’s disciplinary action under the name disciplinary order in the number of disciplinary days as of the date of disciplinary action as of November 19, 2010, two months of suspension three months of three months of suspension from office and three months of suspension from office and three months of suspension from office and five months of suspension from office and three months of suspension from office and six months of suspension from office, and three months of temporary suspension from office and three months of temporary suspension from office and eight months of temporary suspension from office, and that the intervenor’s application for the report on the establishment of disciplinary action and the ground for disciplinary action as of dismissal from the relevant administrative agency for disciplinary action as of whether to dismiss the application for disciplinary action as of the date of suspension from office and two months of suspension from office.

The grounds for disciplinary action that the plaintiffs were subject to three months of suspension from office due to the participation in illegal strike, etc., but continue to hold propaganda events and assemblies that slander the participants outside of the workplace during the period, and interfere with access to the workplace by blocking the vehicles of the vice-president of the French head office, etc. fall under the grounds for disciplinary action: The disciplinary action is deemed to have been taken for two months of suspension from office or three months of suspension depending on the seriousness of the plaintiffs' misconduct, and thus, it is appropriate to take a disciplinary