logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.07.18 2018구합20834
원장자격정지처분 등 취소
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff A is the president of the D Child Care Center (Authorization Number E; hereinafter the "Child Care Center of this case") located in the Northern-gu, Northern-si C at Port-si.

Plaintiff

B is a person who works for a childcare center in this case from March 1, 2017 as an infant care teacher.

B. On December 6, 2017, at around 14:00, Plaintiff B boarded F (5 years of age) and G (3 years of age) on a school bus (hereinafter “school bus”) parked in the childcare center M (hereinafter “school bus”) and did not report it to Plaintiff B, the president of the relevant childcare center.

Accordingly, F and G (hereinafter referred to as “victims”) were left alone within about 35 minutes of school buses from 14:00 to 14:35 on that day.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

On December 26, 2017, the defendant received a report from H, and conducted a field investigation on the child care center of this case. On December 26, 2017, the defendant issued a disposition suspending qualification for the following three months.

The details of dispositions taken under Article 47 (Suspension of Qualifications for Child Care Teachers) of the Infant Care Act for three months (Suspension of Qualifications for Child Care Teachers) of suspension of qualifications for Plaintiff A (Representative/Director) Infant Care Teachers) under Article 46 (Suspension of Qualifications for Child Care Teachers) of the Infant Care Act (Suspension of Qualifications for Child Care Teachers) for the suspension of qualifications for Plaintiff B (Child Care Teachers from February 1 to April 30, 2018), Article 47 (Suspension of Qualifications for Infant Care Teachers) of the Infant Care Act (Suspension of Qualifications for Infant Care Teachers)

D. The Plaintiffs were dissatisfied with each of the above dispositions and filed an appeal with the Gyeonggi-do Administrative Appeals Commission, but the appeal was dismissed on February 26, 2018.

E. Accordingly, on March 12, 2018, the Defendant changed the period of qualification suspension stipulated in each of the above dispositions to “from May 1, 2018 to July 31, 2018”.

As above, the defendant's disposition of December 26, 2017, which changed the suspension period of qualification, is "the disposition of this case".

【Ground for recognition”, 【Nos. 1, 2, and 4 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

2.3.2.2.2.2.33.2.2.2.33 1.2.33

arrow