logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.01.17 2018고정93
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the lessee referred to in subparagraph d and e of the second floor of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which is owned by B, and the Defendant was unable to pay rent to B, and the Defendant was dissatisfied with the filing of the lawsuit against B, and the Defendant was found to the first floor meeting room of the building in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on October 10, 2017. On October 16, 2017, the Defendant demanded the extension of the lease term to the victim G, the head of the general affairs team of B, and the victim H, etc., who is not bad.

Ep. Does the marbs made up of these circumstances with multiple manipulations, and the marbs are considered to be the mother.

The expression of “heat gue gue........” and the termination of one-way death.

The victims were asked to leave the above meeting room, and they continued to refuse to do so, and there was a disturbance, such as attempting to take the hand in a knife at 19:40 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victims' tolerance, legal affairs, and method by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of a witness G, I and J;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Each record book and each record;

1. A detailed statement of 112 reported cases processing;

1. The crime of interference with business is likely to be established only with business by finding in the meeting room of the first floor of the F building recorded in the facts constituting a crime by the defendant, and resisting against the victims of the relevant lawsuit (limited to the case where the defendant stays in a part of the glass wall in the above meeting room, and the disturbance is not likely to be avoided within the meeting room;

(2) The victims shall be required to leave again

Despite the request, since the defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender from October 16:30 of 2017 to 20:27 of the same day when he was arrested as a flagrant offender at the police, the employees, including the victims, are willing to act as the defendant.

arrow