Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 11, 2018, around 05:35, the Defendant was drunk in the elevator B apartment house C-dong, Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, with a report, and caused the Defendant by being called for, the Defendant, and thereby causing the Defendant, the police officer belonging to the police station of the Daejeon Mine Police Station, the Defendant “Iee Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Im. Ie Ie I

“I” and “I” are the error of the internal price.

“In doing the bath theory, she threatened a bad hand and left hand with a threat, and assaulted the face of E that is protruding outside to defend it on one occasion.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the police officer who executes the 112 report processing affairs, thereby hindering the legitimate execution of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by capturing CCTVs;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The punishment of a fine like the order shall be imposed, taking into consideration the following circumstances: (a) spiting or spiting the nature of a crime against a police official who implements relief measures against a police official who has stated the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; (b) the degree of interference with the performance of official duties and violence is not relatively heavy; (c) there was no criminal record exceeding the same criminal record or fine; (d) the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime; and (e) records such as the circumstances after the crime and the conditions of sentencing as specified in the arguments of this case.