logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.03.26 2019고단2480
특수협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Special intimidation, around July 27, 2019, the Defendant, at around 22:58, when the victim C in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, served as a luxer, the Defendant b d'D’, breadddd the victim at a large interest to be informed by the victim, and ordered a coffee and melting with a melter who does not have a me, and breadd the victim, who continued to be informed by the victim from the owner of the said knife, knife, which is a dangerous object (20 cm length, 35 cm in total length) displayed on the knife knife line, and threatened the victim with the victim “I will die. I will be unable to do so,” and the said knife the customers in the said knife.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's drinking business and threatened the victim with dangerous things.

2. On July 27, 2019, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant, on the road front of the foregoing “D” alcohol house on July 23, 2019. On the 112 Report, the Defendant arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender, and the Defendant received a charge of committing the crime as prescribed in the foregoing paragraph (1), such as arresting the said F’s input part on one’s head.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports and criminal investigations by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Each police statement made to F and C;

1. G statements;

1. Photographs used by the suspect for committing the crime;

1. In relation to the obstruction of performance of official duties of Chapter 1 of ctv video CD, the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the police officer, at the time of committing the crime, he did not intentionally commit the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, since he did not intentionally assault the police officer, while the police officer's ctv video ctv video CD 1 suffered from a sudden pain by the defendant during the process of taking the lock, and suck back with the defendant after the cambling, and did not intentionally assault the police officer. However, according to the evidence presented as evidence of the above conviction, the defendant decided.

arrow