logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2016.11.02 2016고정196
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 2012, the Defendant forged a private document by using a computer within the office of “Csc golf course” in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul where the Defendant had operated, the Defendant forged one copy of the contract for the lease of commercial building, which is a private document on the rights and duties of the complainant, by stating “G buildings in Songpa-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, D, E, and F” in the location column of the contract for the lease of commercial building (monthly). The land category “building” in the land category column, “refinite concrete,” “refinite golf course” in the land size column, “5 square meters in the size column,” “5.65 square meters in the size column,” “5 square meters in the deposit column,” “gold KRW in the deposit column,” and “in the lessor’s name column,” and then printing out one copy of the contract.

2. On April 30, 2012, the Defendant used the forged document as above to obtain a loan of KRW 45 million by submitting as if it were genuinely formed to an employee in charge of loans belonging to the Switzerland Savings Bank located in Seoul East-dong, Seoul.

3. On April 30, 2012, the Defendant submitted a forged commercial building lease agreement to a staff member in charge of loans in the name and incompeting of the Switzerland Savings Bank located in the Seoul East Eastern on April 30, 2012.

However, even if the above documents were forged, the defendant did not mention the above facts to the above employees, and there was no intention or ability to pay the loan normally even after receiving the loan.

In the end, the Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim in charge of loans due to the name or negligence of the Mapo Savings Bank, acquired the above real estate lease deposit by being paid KRW 45 million as security.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. The police statement of H;

1. A monthly lease contract for commercial buildings;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act and Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document) for criminal facts, the Criminal Act;

arrow