logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.11.05 2013고단1813
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, and for one year and two months, respectively.

However, the defendant A is subject to objection.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendants knew that the defendant A was the mother of the defendant B, and the victim D, who was aware of that he was suffering from an economic burden due to a loan of financial rights to the E-Si building 202 Dong 202 202 dong 202 owned by the victim, and had the victim dispose of it, and had the victim take the charge of receiving the purchase price.

1. The Defendants’ real estate purchase title fraud, together with the Defendants, concluded that, on October 201, 201, the F apartment 102 Dong 309 and Defendant B’s residence of the first police officer, the Defendant purchased the Plaintiff’s land and the housing on the land located at the time of the government-run city of the city, with the purchase price of KRW 67 million. If the Defendants paid KRW 45 million in total, including the sum of KRW 7 million in the down payment and KRW 38 million in the remainder, us succeeds to the lease deposit of the said housing and paid KRW 12 million in the remainder of KRW 10 million.

However, the sale price of the above house is 52 million won, and the lease deposit to be succeeded among them was 32 million won, so if the victim paid 45 million won and used it as the name of return of the house purchase fund and the lease deposit to be actually borne by the defendants, the lease deposit to be actually borne by the defendants is only 7 million won, and there was no intention to succeed to the lease deposit amount of 12 million won or to pay the remaining difference of 10 million won. Furthermore, even if the above house was purchased, it was thought that the ownership transfer registration was made under the Defendant’s sole name, and there was no intention and ability to register the ownership transfer under the name of the victim.

The Defendants conspired to induce the victim as above and received KRW 7 million from the victim as the down payment around October 19, 201, and KRW 38 million as the remainder payment around December 23, 201.

2. Defendant A’s housing repair cost, and Defendant A’s housing repair cost, are located in G at the Government-si around February 1, 2012.

arrow