Defendant shall be punished by a fine of nine million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 30, 2014, from around 22:30 to 23:30 of the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by drinking at “EM stores” operated by the victim D of commercial buildings in front of the Seo-gu Incheon Seo-gu Incheon Complex, by neglecting the disturbance, such as taking a fluoring and booming the indle customers and employees, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. On April 30, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by assaulting the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the reporting duties of the dispatched police officer by assaulting him/her, such as: (a) he/she is a quasi-public official of the Ministry of Environment going through the Ministry of Environment; (b) he/she is a spitus; and (c) where the National Police Agency takes a bath to “dump hubs in the Ministry of Environment; and (d) he/she is walking the ships of the said G on the right edge; and (b) he/she interferes with legitimate performance of duties concerning the reporting duties of the dispatched police

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of photographic c. c. d1 c. c. c. c. c. c. f.

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act has been sentenced three times to a fine for the same kind of crime, and on January 8, 2014, at the Incheon District Court sentenced 6 months to imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of measurement) and 1 year for a suspended sentence, and committed the instant crime under the influence of alcohol even during the suspended sentence period, is recognized as a reason for sentencing unfavorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, when the defendant is detained for more than 40 days, his mistake is divided in depth, the degree of violence used by the defendant is relatively unhutiled, and he has family members.