(영문) 전주지방법원 2013.07.03 2013고정266

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2013.07.03 2013고정266

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving of California passenger cars. At around October 4, 2012, the Defendant, around 17:20 on October 4, 2012, proceeded from the boundary of the public playground to the lot department.

The Defendant, who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by keeping the front side and the left side well, maintaining a safe distance with the front vehicle, and accurately manipulating the steering gear, brake system, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting this and proceeding in the same direction as it was due to negligence, shocked with the part of the victim C (the 22-year-old driver) who suffered from driving of the victim C (the 22-year-old driver), with the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and shocked the back part of the victim E(the 51-year-old driver)’s vehicle in the same direction as the front part of the victim E(the 51-year-old driver’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, the injury to the victim C, such as catum fat, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, the injury to the catum fat, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim E, and the injury to the victim G (V, 23 years of age) who is the passenger of the Drocketing and other car, for about two weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, as stated in Paragraph 1, destroyed each property to ensure that the amount equivalent to KRW 2,010,092 of the repair cost of the Drocketing car is equivalent to the 2,010,092 of the repair cost.

3. An automobile shall not be operated on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;

Nevertheless, from October 4, 2012 to 17:20 on October 4, 2012, the Defendant operated approximately 3 km distance from the Do in front of 1578-4 to the place of accident in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1..

참조조문

-교통사고처리 특례법

-도로교통법

-자동차손해배상 보장법

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 여주지원 2013.05.03 2013고단183

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.04.22 2014고단1793

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.07 2014고정4053

-서울남부지방법원 2013.05.22 2013고단973

-서울서부지방법원 2014.05.22 2014고단103