The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The Defendant is engaged in the duty of driving C-si.

On July 6, 2011, the Defendant driving the above vehicle around 03:10, and driving the front road of the second apartment complex in the Suwon Mine-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City at approximately 60 km from the boundary of the New Chang District to the lower-nam Industrial Complex.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed at the front of that place, in such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle and prevent the accident by driving the motor vehicle in advance according to the traffic signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant is negligent in driving a vehicle while neglecting this and continues to proceed at the same speed by violating the signal, even though the signal is a stop signal.

The E-Motor vehicle driven by D, which violated the signal signal from the left side of the running direction to cross-section, conflicts with the front part of the Defendant’s taxi (hereinafter “instant accident”).

In the end, the defendant's occupational negligence caused about two weeks to the victim FF (the age of 38) who boarded the defendant's driver's vehicle to suffer from an open eye and snow room in need of treatment.

2. The Defendant’s summary of the Defendant’s defense counsel did not violate his own signals, and rather, D’s proceeding in violation of the signals, thereby causing the instant accident.

3. Determination

가. 공소사실에 부합하는 정황 증인 G, H의 각 일부 법정진술, G, H에 대한 각 경찰 진술조서의 일부 진술기재, 수사보고(사고장소 교차로 신호체계도)의 기재에 의하면, G과 H은 경찰 및 이 법정에서, 자신들은 이 사건 사고 당시 피고인 운전의 택시와는 반대방향에서 진행을 하고 있었는데 쿵 소리를 듣고 사고가 발생하였음을 인식하였고, 그 소리를 들을 당시...