logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.08.28 2013구단1343
국가유공자등록거부처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s refusal to register a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on September 3, 2012 is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 23, 2001, the Plaintiff was CB and was seconded for the Army soldier, and was appointed as a riot police officer on November 25, 2001 (hereinafter “presidential police officer”). On June 7, 2002, the Plaintiff transferred to the Police Hospital on June 7, 2002, but was released from secondment on October 15, 2003.

B. On March 27, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State for the following: (a) a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State on the following grounds: (b) a person who has been unable to find out his or her occupational personality when the disease occurred without any special injury, such as double or incurable injury, due to the symptoms such as the symptoms at the time of his or her service; (c) a medical advisory opinion was presented that no person can find the identity of the person who has rendered distinguished services to the State; or (d) a person who has received training or excessive physical or mental stress or received excessive registration or confirmation of proximate causal relation on the ground that he or she did not perform his or her duty, other than the Plaintiff’s statement, and on September 3, 2012, the Defendant did not have any objective causal relation between the Plaintiff and the person who has rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that he or she had sustained physical or mental stress or aggravated causal relation.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 to 6, fact inquiry inquiry reply to the Military Manpower Administration of this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff caused a lack of water surface due to frequent shift of work at the police hospital, etc., by driving ices and ices prior to the appointment of the police hospital.

b) the Commission;

arrow