1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for dismissal, addition, or deletion of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【The part to be removed, added, or deleted】 The second part of the second part of the 16th part was purchased and purchased “The registration of ownership transfer was completed on the same day, and the land of this case was completed on August 10, 1985 due to the partition of co-owned property on August 16, 1985.”

The deceased is entitled to ownership to the head of the housing (A) of the Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Seoul, "F (J. 7 March 2010)" in Part 3 of Part 9 of the Third Party, "The deceased is entitled to ownership to the head of the housing (A) located in Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, 2010. The head of South (A) bears all the expenses of the peti hospital. E

The term " hospital expenses" in the 11 and 12th of the third place shall be deleted.

Each “content 13 and 14” in the third place shall be raised as “the purport”.

Part 16 of the 3rd page [based on recognition] shall add “A evidence 8, B 16” to the column.

In Part 5, the phrase “divided from the land” shall be deleted.

Part 6 of the first 18 "pre-act" is regarded as "pre-living act".

The plaintiff's argument is without merit, since it is "the third party".

In addition, the plaintiff asserts that each of the above self-written documents is invalid or that it was made by the defendants' deception or coercion, and it is difficult to view that it was made by the real will of the deceased at the time when the deceased prepared the above written self-written documents, and therefore, it does not constitute a pre-act of withdrawing the effect of a will pursuant to the instant written evidence. However, the statement of evidence Nos. 11 and 24 alone did not have the mental capacity at the time when the deceased prepared each written self

It is not sufficient to recognize that each of the above documents has been written by deception or coercion by the Defendants, and it is otherwise recognized.