1. The defendant's judgment of Gwangju District Court for C and D shall have the executory power over divorce cases No. 2010Ra2489.

1. The fact that there is no dispute over the cause of the claim, and comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of Gap evidence No. 1 and evidence No. 3 and the purport of the whole pleadings, the defendant is acknowledged as having received a claim for the return of lease deposit to be paid by C and D based on the executory recommendation of divorce case No. 2010ddan2489 on May 13, 2015, under which C and D received a claim for the return of lease deposit from the defendant as to the claim indicated in the attached list under this Court No. 2015TT2083, but it is recognized that the lessee who is not C and D is the plaintiff.

Therefore, the compulsory execution against the claims listed in the separate sheet on May 13, 2015 based on the defendant's decision on the recommendation for reconciliation against C and D should be denied.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.