A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 19:00 on September 16, 2018, the Defendant insultingd the victim by taking care of the victim, including, but not limited to, the victim’s typists, drivers of the bus, and other passengers on the bus that the victim D was aboard at the bus stops near the C Hospital located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and insulting the victim.

2. On October 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 15:35, 2018, at the front of the agricultural product collection center located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, for the reason that the victim D (here, 88 years old) stolen drilling from the Defendant’s dry field and stolen it from the Defendant’s dry field, thereby causing about 8 times the victim’s inner part of the drinking house; and (b) on the part of the female in need of approximately 3 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. A report on occurrence (A);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the Defendant and the defense counsel asserts that, in relation to Article 37 (former part), Articles 38 (1) 2, and 50 of the Criminal Act (only to the extent that the punishment is added to the punishment prescribed in the heavier injury crime and the long-term punishment for the offense of insult) of the Criminal Act, the Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that, in relation to Article 37 (2) of the Criminal Act, “The motive of the Defendant when the Defendant was a victim is not due to the victim’s theft, but due to the victim’s desire to take the Defendant’s wife, and that the number of times only eight is not more than

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., the victim testified that the victim suffered damage as stated in paragraph (2) of the facts charged in this court, and the victim's testimony is consistent with the main contents compared to the statements in the investigation agency, consistent, and relatively detailed description of the circumstances at the time.