The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The Defendant’s judgment on the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing may be taken into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant recognized the Defendant’s act of crime; (b) the Defendant raised three children after the divorce; (c) but the Defendant applied for formal trial upon receiving a summary order issued on December 20, 2012 due to the fact that he/she was driving under the influence of alcohol on September 14, 2012 and abused a person within the traffic accident; and (d) the Defendant committed the instant unlicensed and drunk driving without being aware of the fact that he/she was committing the instant crime; and (e) other various sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and arguments, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, family environment, degree of drinking, driving distance, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment (two years of suspended sentence for August, 201, community service, 120 hours, and 40 hours of attending the compliance driving curriculum) is reasonable and too unreasonable.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.