A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

The execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 14, 2017, from around 02:00 to around 02:17 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the instant victim’s household service by avoiding disturbance by gathering beer’s disease from the “E summary store” of the victim D’s operation in the prime city of the prime city from around 02:00 to around 02:17 of the same day on the ground that the drinking value had been high; and (b) putting the beer’s disease back to the front and its employees; and (c) putting the beer’s employees at large sounds; and (d) obstructing the said victim’s household service.

2. On the same day, the Defendant was unable to have the victim G (45) who is a public official belonging to the police branch of the police station F District of the original police station, who was dispatched after receiving a report at around 02:17 on the same day and received a report at the above place, and was unable to have the Defendant take a photograph of the said victim, who was a public official belonging to the police branch of the police station F District of the original police station (45 ). The said victim prevented him from taking such a photograph. The victim was tightly sealed by his body, shouldered his face, shouldered the face, and obstructed the victim’s performance of duties concerning the prevention and investigation of the above police officer’s crime, and the handling of the reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as field photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense; Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act; Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. For the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, each of the crimes of this case, which interfered with another person’s business site for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, and inflicted an injury upon the police officer who received a report and interfered with the performance of official duties by the police officer, needs to be punished for the reason that the nature

However, the defendant reflects the wrong, and the victim of the crime interfering with business expressed his intention not to punish the defendant during the trial process, there is no record of criminal punishment due to the crime interfering with the execution of official duties, and it goes beyond the fine after 1985.