beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a spouse who has completed the marriage report with D on October 2, 2002, and Defendant B is a spouse who has completed the marriage report with E on May 5, 2000.
1. Defendant A
A. On March 201, 201, the Defendant, in a room where it is difficult to find out the name of a woman with a view to having a spouse B and one time, in which it is known that he/she had a spouse in a room where it is difficult to find out the name of a woman with a view to having a spouse.
B. On July 201, 201, the Defendant was aware that he was a spouse of B and once, in a room where it is impossible to know the heading of “G” Masan City F, which was located in the G, with the knowledge that he was a spouse.
In this respect, the defendant was divided into the above B, each of the two parts, and the two parts.
2. Defendant B
A. The Defendant’s above No. 1 A
At the same time, at the same time and place as the foregoing, A had a sexual intercourse with A once.
B. The defendant 1-B
At the same time and place as Paragraph A, even though he/she is aware that he/she is a spouse of the above A, he/she provided sexual intercourses with A once with the above.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Statement of each prosecutorial statement concerning D and E;
1. Each complaint;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each divorce collector, certificate of marriage, and family relation certificate;
1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act
1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act
1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and
1. Defendants subject to suspended execution: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of each Criminal Code (including that the Defendants reflect their mistakes and have no record of being punished for the same kind of crime).