logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.12.24 2014가합63836
계약무효확인 등
Text

1. It is confirmed that the insurance contract entered into between the Plaintiff and the Defendant A is null and void.

2.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 5, 201, the Plaintiff and Defendant A entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant A’s mother as the insured (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”). The instant insurance contract is to pay KRW 20,000 per day of hospitalization in case of being hospitalized with injury or disease due to the guaranteed insurance.

B. Defendant B was hospitalized for 15 days at C Hospital on February 13, 2012, including the occurrence of insurance accidents and the Plaintiff’s insurance money, as indicated in the attached Table 2, during the period from February 13, 2012 to June 3, 2014, each hospital was hospitalized for 318 days in total. The Plaintiff received KRW 8,160,000,000 from the Plaintiff according to the instant insurance contract.

C. The status of the conclusion of each insurance contract that Defendant B was the insured and each insurance contract that was concluded by Defendant B as the insured, which was maintained at the time of the conclusion of the instant insurance contract, or the insurance money that the Defendants received from the insurance companies including the Plaintiff due to the insurance accidents as seen earlier pursuant to the instant insurance contract and the above insurance contracts are listed below.

(1) Of the insurance contracts concluded with Defendant B as the insured, the insurance contract of this case was terminated before the conclusion of the insurance contract, and the content or nature of the insurance contract of this case was excluded. The insurance contract of this case was terminated before the conclusion of the insurance contract of this case, and the insurance contract of this case and the content or nature of the insurance contract of this case were excluded. The insurance contract of this case were classified as the name of the company, and the insurance money of monthly payment (cost) for the insured to be paid to the insured to the first interest-free women who are non-high 1,008-09-11,469, Defendant B termination. B, Defendant B, 2010-04-29 47,045, Defendant B, B,809,765, and the family care 16,80,000 D, B,12,1600 D, and the amount of monthly payment insurance money of the insurance money of this case to be paid to Defendant B, Defendant B, and Defendant B-28407,297.7.7

arrow