1. Order 1 and 2 of the first instance judgment are modified as follows. A.

The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) is against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, with the exception of the part below 2-B(2) and below (from the 6th to the last 7th eth eth eth eths) in the judgment of the court of first instance, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. As such, it is reasonable to view that the Plaintiff and the Defendant settled the loan amount of KRW 3.6 million from the Plaintiff on September 19, 2012 with the loan amount of KRW 3.6 million with the loan amount of KRW 2,00,000,000 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on September 19, 2012 and the Defendant on September 19, 2012. According to the above acknowledged facts, it is reasonable to view that the Plaintiff and the Defendant settled the loan amount of KRW 3.6 million with the loan amount of KRW 5 million with the loan amount of KRW 5,000,0000 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on September 19, 202.

The Plaintiff asserts that on November 6, 2012, KRW 5 million (Evidence 2-3 of A), KRW 5 million (Evidence 2-4 of December 14, 2012), and KRW 2 million of November 26, 2012 were omitted in the attached Form 2.

However, [Attachment 2] List, each of the above five million won was borrowed on November 7, 2012 and December 14, 2012, which was the date of account transfer, and the above two million won was included in the loan amounting to two million won of “the sum of two million won first,” as stated in evidence No. 2-4 and included in the loan amounting to five million won on December 14, 2012.