logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.07.19 2017가단201210
보증금반환채권 명의이전청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant shall express his/her intention to the plaintiff as to the claim stated in the attached sheet to the non-party C.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The first lease contract is the Plaintiff’s satch, and the Plaintiff’s husband and wife were living together with the Defendant’s husband and the Defendant’s husband and wife living together with the Plaintiff’s house owned by Non-Party E (hereinafter “the deceased”) who is the Plaintiff’s husband due to his business failure (the multi-household house of 4 households on the ground of Eunpyeong-gu F).

During that period, on July 23, 2010, the deceased sold the above house owned by himself to Nonparty G, and ordered the Plaintiff to sell the house to Nonparty G, which was KRW 76.5 million out of the sales price (the purchaser G deposited the remainder of KRW 76.5 million in H’s name on August 2, 2010, and the Plaintiff deposited KRW 76.5 million in the account of the deceased on August 2, 2010, the date of deposit. The Plaintiff collected KRW 76.5 million as a check from the account of the deceased used by himself on August 2, 2010). The Plaintiff paid the lease deposit with the money deposited by Nonparty I by renting the house of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul, where the Plaintiff and the Defendant couple live together for two years from August 2, 2010 (the amount of the lease deposit was the first KRW 67 million, but the Plaintiff claimed that the lease deposit was KRW 7.7 million under the name of the lessee, and the Defendant claimed that it was the Plaintiff’s title 62 million.

(hereinafter referred to as "the first lease contract"). (b)

After the termination of the first lease contract, the Plaintiff entered into a lease contract with the Defendant and resided together with the Defendant’s husband and wife on three additional occasions as follows: (a) the Plaintiff received the refund of the deposit for lease; and (b) rents another house under the Defendant’s name and uses it to pay the deposit.

From a third party to the second lease contract of Eunpyeong-gu, the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of KRW 70 million, and the period from February 2, 2013 to February 2, 2014, the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of KRW 70 million, out of the deposit of KRW 110,000,000, the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the third lease of the lease of Eunpyeong-gu.

arrow