beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' claim of this case against the defendants is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On December 31, 1997, 197, 1997, 19 employees, including the plaintiffs and the defendants, who were working together in dopco, purchased the land of this case prior to subdivision 4112 square meters (hereinafter “the land of this case prior to subdivision”). The land of this case prior to subdivision was divided into M 3921 square meters (hereinafter “the land of this case”) on August 20, 2004 and Q 191 square meters. At the date of the closing of argument of this case, the plaintiffs and the defendants possess the share of the land of this case as shown in the attached Form ownership.
B. R, Defendant K, S, T, U, Defendant L, V, Plaintiff C, Plaintiff C, Plaintiff A, and E, on the instant land prior to subdivision on July 2, 1998, shall be deemed to have waived contact with 70 persons, and the parking lot shall be 12 large-scale multi-household type 11 households whose own stocks are 138 square meters, subject to construction permission, and the attached Form No. 101 and 104 shall begin in 198 and completed in 1999, and the attached Form No. 102 and 103 households indicated in the attached Form No. 102 and 103 were commenced in 201 and completed in 202, and the new construction of the housing on the instant land was waived by Defendant G, Defendant D, and S.
C. Defendant L, 101 Dong 102 No. 101, Defendant F, 102 Dong 102, Defendant F, and 102 Dong 102 were owned by the Plaintiff respectively, and Defendant K, 102 Dong 103, Dong 102 Dong 103, Defendant X (X refers to the birth of Defendant K), and Defendant E, 104 Dong 102, Dong 103 Dong 102, Defendant E, and 104 Dong 102, Plaintiff C, Dong 104 Dong 103, each of the above houses (101 Dong 104 through Dong 104 referred to as “instant aggregate buildings, etc.”), and the land of this case was registered as an aggregate building, but no registration of the site of this case has been made.
At the location of 104, 103, there are joint septic tanks for the instant housing, etc.
Grounds for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2-1 through 10, Gap evidence 3-6, all pleadings.