A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. Co-defendant D, before separation of the premise facts, reported the marriage with E on December 12, 1963, and divorced on January 9, 2003, and the Defendant knew about 30 to 40 years.

On October 20, 2002, the Defendant and D have not agreed to sell D and Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu F large 216.2 square meters (hereinafter “instant site”) and distribute them officially. Notwithstanding the fact that E, on October 4, 2011, entered into a lawsuit for the removal of a building and the claim for the delivery of a site against G, the owner of the instant site, and forged a certificate of confirmation (agreement) that E agreed to jointly distribute the instant site with D and E, then filed an application for the provisional disposition for the prohibition of disposal of real estate on the instant site against E, and conspired to deliver a certificate of assignment of claims, such as rent, etc., with E, to D, as if they were transferred to D.

2. Criminal facts;

A. (1) The Defendant and D entered the “written confirmation” with the content that “E” was “E” and affixed a seal to E, while faithfully managing the instant site, at the closed location of the date of 2011, the Defendant and D entered “E” with the content that “D has a substantial right to the instant site,” “E shall be distributed E, D, and E, after the purchase of the instant site in good faith.”

Accordingly, the Defendant and D forged a “certificate” in the name of E, a private document related to rights and obligations without authority for the purpose of exercising their rights and obligations in collusion.

(2) On October 21, 201, the Defendant and D conspired, at the Seoul Central District Court’s civil petition office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court, Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court on 157, which received an application for provisional disposition of real estate disposal prohibition against D, and as such, D received an application for provisional disposition of real estate disposal prohibition against E, the Seoul Central District Court may have no knowledge of the fact that D was duly formed with evidentiary documents by attaching one “written confirmation” in the name of forged E as above.