logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.09.13 2017고단172
위증
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] The Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment and three years of suspended execution on October 28, 2016 by the Gwangju High Court on October 20, 2016, due to a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Intermediating, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, which became final and conclusive on October 28, 2016 and is currently under suspended execution.

[2] On January 9, 2017, the Defendant appeared and arranged as a witness of the case, such as violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, etc. of Arranging 157 Gohap 157 Gohap 2016 Gohap 2016 Gohap 157 B, etc. from the court of law No. 316 of the Gwangju District Court's Mancheon-si, Mancheon-si, 211.

During the examination of the instant case, the Defendant: (a) During the examination of the instant case, the Defendant was found to have taken care of the victim’s face and head on the ground that he/she attached to the victim (D) at the Haman C business on May 2015, along with the Defendant; and (b) the Defendant was able to take care of the victim’s head due to his/her personal injury.

“I do not have any question.”

(2) On December 23, 2015, the witness: (a) took the cell phone owned by the victim and the E head of the Tong to which expenses for supply of and demand for persons with disabilities are paid so that the victim may not contact with his/her family when the victim escaped; and (b) took the victim’s cell phone and E head of the Tong to which expenses for supply of and demand for persons with disabilities are paid when the victim goes out of the place of business;

“I do not refer to the question “.”

"............ for the victim of sexual traffic"

I did not compel the question "............."

“The answer was respectively made.”

However, on May 2015, B had induced D, who is a class 3 intellectually disabled person, to "C" located in F at a time in order to engage in sexual traffic, and had assaulted D in collaboration with the Defendant around that time. Until December 23, 2015, B prevented D from escape with the Defendant and forced D to engage in sexual traffic.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in court;

arrow