Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duties of driving CK7 taxi.

On September 14, 2013, at around 06:25, the Defendant driven the above taxi, leading about about 20-30 km from the side of the Gwangju National University to the four-lane road in front of the JG electronic route in Jin-dong, Nam-gu, Gwangju National University, along two-lanes.

At the time, the new wall is getting off, and the front door of the road was passed, and there is a crosswalk in which signal lights are installed, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check whether there is a person who gets on the road by reducing speed and by properly examining the front door and the left and right of the road, and to safely drive the road in accordance with the new subparagraph.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim D (70 years of age) who cross the crosswalk from the right side of the crosswalk to the left side by neglecting the fact that the vehicle driving signal is changed to the stop signal, and instead did not discover the victim D (70 years of age) who cross the crosswalk from the right side of the crosswalk, and shocked the above victim with the front part of the taxi driving seat of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim, such as a pelvisus and pelvisus, which require approximately eight weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Entry in a statement on the occurrence of a DNA traffic accident;

1. Each entry of the results of the initial investigation into a traffic accident, the report on a traffic accident, and the medical certificate;

1. Application of image Acts and subordinate statutes to traffic accident scene photographs;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1), Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the reason for sentencing of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act cannot be deemed to be somewhat weak, the victim has expressed his/her intention not to punish the defendant because he/she received compensation, and the defendant has been finally guilty for the last ten years.