logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.07.20 2016고단1766
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On March 10, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. on June in the same court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on March 18, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On April 2015, the Defendant committed fraud in early April 2015, at the D office operated by the victim C in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S. police officer on April 2, 2015, the Defendant was working for day duty at the above office and carried out her friendship. The Defendant was working for the victim “A site warden of the corporation E, his child, who was working for day duty and became a child for day duty by video operation.”

The purpose of this paper is to say that the work performed by E would be ordered to receive a subcontract for the construction of the ancillary facilities in F, and thus would be changed to one million won at the receipt cost.

However, the defendant did not have any ability or intention to get a subcontract to the victim because he was not related to E.

After all, the Defendant, as seen above, was accused of the victim, and was transferred one million won to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (H) in the name of the Defendant as the part of receiving around April 9, 2015 from the victim, under the name of the Defendant.

2. On April 23, 2015, around April 23, 2015, the Defendant told the victim C to the effect that “The Defendant was awarded a subcontract for construction work according to the plan, and thus, changed 700,000 won at document cost.”

However, as above, the Defendant did not have been awarded a subcontract for construction work due to no relations with E.

After all, the Defendant, as seen above, was accused of the victim, and was remitted 70,000 won to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the said G in terms of the same day’s document cost.

3. The act of forging a private document or holding a falsified falsified document on April 24, 2015;

A. On April 24, 2014, the Defendant of a private document forgery is to exercise the right to make a false document and present it to C with a view to making it trust, at the office of the dispute settlement council, which is substantially operated by C in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, with a view to exercising the right to submit it to C.

arrow