A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has operated the manufacturing business of the trade name C Co., Ltd from the second floor of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building B.

On November 18, 2014, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the victim company to pay monthly rent of KRW 1,538,320 to the victim company for 48 months during the lease period, on the second floor of the above plant, the ownership of leased goods, such as the victim company, and the defendant operation company entered into a lease agreement with the victim company to the effect that the victim company may terminate the lease agreement and claim the return of the leased goods from the second floor of the above factory to 78,80,000,000, and from that time, the victim company's name was 0,000,000,000,000 won among the above 2nd floor of the factory embezzlement; and from that time, the victim company's name was 1,538,320,000,000 won to the above 30,000,000 won to the above 2nd floor of the plant embezzlement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a lease agreement;

1. Relevant Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The scope of recommendations based on the sentencing guidelines for the reasons of sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order and the protection observation: The scope of recommendations based on the sentencing guidelines for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: In light of the fact that the defendant cannot vindicate the company's machinery for personal purposes in light of the fact that the decision that there is no person subject to a special sentencing [the person subject to a special sentencing] in the basic area (from April to one year and four months) [the person subject to special sentencing] of the category 1, the basic area (from April to one year and four months], and the defendant cannot explain the place where the criminal proceeds have been used, the crime is suspected to be used for personal purposes

However, the fact that the defendant led to an offense, paid 8.5 million won out of the amount of damage, and the defendant exceeds the same criminal record or fine.