logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.01.10 2018가단16328
건물인도등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Attached drawings (the current status of a building) among the buildings listed in the attached list shall be indicated1, (2), (3), (4), and (4);

Reasons

1. On March 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) leased to the Defendant a section 56.2 square meters (hereinafter “instant building”) of the attached sheet among the buildings listed in the attached list (building status map); (b) the Plaintiff, in turn, leased the leased deposit of KRW 11 million, KRW 1210,000 per month for rent (including value added tax, April of each month); and (c) the said contract was renewed on March 1, 2018, by setting the lease deposit of KRW 11 million; and (d) the lease term of KRW 1210,000 per month.

However, despite the Plaintiff’s claim, the Defendant did not pay the agreed rent until July 31, 2018, and collected KRW 1,3530,000,000,000. The Plaintiff terminated the instant lease on the ground of two or more years of delay in rent, and filed a claim against the Defendant for the payment of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent by the date of delivery.

2. Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Judgment by public notice) of the applicable provisions of Acts;

arrow