logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.12.22 2016고정584
모욕등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On August 14, 2015, at the entrance of Ulsan-gu C Apartment 102, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, 102, the Defendant expressed that “The victim considered D(27 years of age) as an infinite resident on the ground that the victim’s her children expressed a desire to do so to the Defendant, and tried to take the victim’s face by walking at the victim’s left left side buckbucks.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd and abused the victim.

2. Determination:

A. (i) In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, it is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the Defendant stated that “I will find our children and grow up and grow up” as stated in the facts charged, but the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the Defendant stated “I am sue, I ame or ame equal,” and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

① In this court, the victim argued that the Defendant only stated that he was “I am son’s son,” but the Defendant expressed that he was “I am son’s son’s son’s son,” and that the Prosecutor asked that “I am son’s son is a young farbed disease by finding our son.”

② The victim stated in the investigative agency that he had the statement as stated in the above facts charged by the Defendant, but thereafter, the victim stated that he was “A” rather than the Defendant, who stated that he had the words “A”, “A” et al.

(14, 127 pages). (3) At this court, F, a witness, testified that the contents of the Defendant’s abusive language are not memory in detail, and there is no specific statement in the investigation agency.

Article 311 of the Criminal Code.

arrow