logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.09.08 2016구합100071
교원소청심사위원회결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. An intervenor is an incorporated educational foundation that operates C University. The Plaintiff is appointed as a teacher of C University on March 1, 2014 and currently holds office as an assistant professor for the National Defense and Police Administration Department at C University.

On April 29, 2015, the Plaintiff instructed the student to give an interim examination-oriented grading, and the student given an examination grading.

The Plaintiff received a marina from female students on May 4, 2015 and May 11, 2015.

This is in violation of Article 3, Article 1 (Duty of Good Faith) and 7 (Duty of Maintenance of Dignity) of C University Teachers and Staff Regulations.

B. On June 9, 2015, the Intervenor’s president, upon receipt of a request to take disciplinary action against the Plaintiff, requested the Intervenor’s Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee to take disciplinary action against the Plaintiff on or around June 11, 2015 as follows.

C. On June 25, 2015, the Intervenor teachers’ disciplinary committee held the first teachers’ disciplinary committee (hereinafter “the second teachers’ disciplinary committee”) and the second teachers’ disciplinary committee (hereinafter “the second teachers’ disciplinary committee”) on July 21, 2015, the Plaintiff was a member of the Plaintiff who takes lessons from a female student who takes lessons at the faculty research room in the university (hereinafter “instant disciplinary committee”) on May 4, 2015, and May 11, 2015. In particular, on May 11, 2015, the Intervenor was able to set up the entrance of the laboratory, Scke, and was scam and was scambling, and was scamed.

(hereinafter “instant Disciplinary Reason No. 1”). On April 29, 2015, the Plaintiff instructed the student to give an interim examination-oriented grading method to the student, and the student given a test grading method.

(hereinafter “instant Disciplinary Reason 2” refers to a violation of Article 3 subparag. 1 (Duty of Good Faith) and subparag. 7 (Duty of Good Faith) of the C University Teachers and Staff Regulations.

Recognizing the existence of the suspension, it was decided to take the two-month disciplinary action.

Accordingly, on July 22, 2015, the president of the Intervenor shall be the Plaintiff.

arrow