logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.09.04 2015구단53773
요양불승인처분등취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On October 7, 2014, the subject disposition Plaintiff: “On April 17, 2014, at the construction site of an officetel located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City B and C, the Plaintiff was infected by the infection, both slocks, slocks, slocks, the left-hand slocks, and the unit salt of the unit” (hereinafter “the instant disease”). The Plaintiff filed an application for medical care approval with the Defendant (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

On October 21, 2014, the Defendant issued a disposition not to grant medical care on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the pertinent accident with respect to the instant injury (hereinafter “instant disposition not to grant medical care”), and changed the injury and disease to the sacratum salted base (three weeks of hospitalization and three weeks of Tongwons) and approved medical care.

On March 3, 2015, the Plaintiff again filed an application for the approval of additional injury and disease care with the Defendant as a complex injury and injury and injury and injury.

On March 19, 2015, the Defendant issued a disposition not to grant approval to the Plaintiff on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the above disaster or the injury or disease at the approval of the Plaintiff.

hereinafter referred to as "the disposition of non-approval for the Additional Injury and Disease Medical Care in this case" (the fact that there is no dispute over grounds for recognition, evidence No. 2-4, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff suffered from the injury and disease of this case, and there is a medical causal relationship between the two injury and the two injury and the two injury and injury and injury and injury and the non-approval of the additional injury and injury and injury and injury and injury and injury and injury and injury and injury and injury and injury and injury

B. In light of the following: Gap’s evidence Nos. 1-4, 7-10, 14, 15 (including household numbers), and the result of the request for the examination of the medical records to the hospital of Kang Dong-hee National University, the result of the request for the examination of the medical records, and the whole purport of the pleadings as a result of the request for the examination of the examination of the records; and the following circumstances, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9-16 (including household numbers); the result of the above request for the examination; the result of the above

an occupational accident or an injury or disease approved as a medical care.

arrow