Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, for eight months, for Defendant B, and for one year and two months, for Defendant C, respectively.

(b).

Punishment of the crime

Defendant C, who works as a brokerage assistant in the “G Authorized Broker Office” located in Busan City, would have obtained loans from Defendant B at the end of 2014 to the end of early 2015, after changing the name of Defendant B, which is the name of Defendant B’s wife, to the name of Defendant B, which is the name of Defendant B’s wife, and falsely leased the same, and returned the lease deposit to the existing revenue by using the loan borrowed from the financial institution, and then divided the loans by receiving the above officetels which was the public office as security.

Defendant B accepted it at that time, and around March 5, 2015, according to the direction of Defendant C, the above officetels was changed to his name and delegated Defendant C with the right to transfer the false lease.

On March 9, 2015, Defendant C made a false lease agreement to the effect that the lease contract was concluded between Defendant B and the Defendant for the instant officetel amounting to KRW 138,000,000,000,000,000,000 for the purpose of committing the crime to Defendant A, who was introduced as a false lessee through Defendant I, at the above authorized broker office, as the fraudulent lessee was falsely tenant and the documents necessary to obtain the loan for the lease was accepted by Defendant A.

After that, on the 12th day of the same month, Defendant C and A applied for a loan of KRW 110 million in the name of Defendant C and A for the loan of KRW 100 million in the name of the above office of the above authorized broker.

However, in fact, Defendant B did not have the intention to rent the above officetel on the other hand, and Defendant A did not actually rent the above officetel and did not have the intention to reside in it, and Defendant C also knew it well.